01 7 / 2014

jontronshat:

wentdog:

The ’50s were fucked up man.

*tries this at next house party*

jontronshat:

wentdog:

The ’50s were fucked up man.

*tries this at next house party*

(via phrygianskittles)

01 7 / 2014

zombieirish:

retailavenger85:

tekillashooter:

blasianxbri:

dude-its-faris-ridhwan:

what the fuck

LMFAOOOO.

Always reblog lol

Have you guys never seen the original Starbucks logo? It’s still up at the first store in the Pike Place (which isn’t actually the first store, but shhhh)

image

YEP, THERE YOU HAVE IT

(Source: fireball-mudflap, via the-absolute-funniest-posts)

01 7 / 2014

Anonymous said: what do you think of how scientists "proved homosexuality exists in nature" (like how they found "homosexuality" in giraffes and dogs and such.) I think it's really ridiculous, like I think it's really a stretch and a wild misinterpretation

real-justice-waluigi:

thewolvesagainsthomosexuality:

At this point, anything they can use to promote homosexuality will be used because this nation is all about perversion now. Animals may take part in it, but you let any male animal of any species get anywhere near a female in heat…and you’ll see the switch to heterosexuality come so fast that someone will puke a rainbow from it.

And yes, anon, it’s extremely ridiculous. Thank you for your question! God bless and have a wonderful night<3

~Couch Wolf

ACTUALLY, according to this source, some homosexual animals completely ignore members of the opposite sex.  The article goes on to say that the study found that homosexuality in animal populations may confer certain evolutionary advantages.  

This article discusses homosexual animal pairings that display the same bonding behavior as hetero animal pairings.  It even goes on to talk about how male flamingo pairs sometimes raise foster chicks together.

I don’t understand how observable proof is “a stretch and a wild misinterpretation” when homosexual behavior has been exhibited in over 450 observed species.

And, also, if you read those sources, you’ll see that those homosexual males WON’T, in fact, “switch” to heterosexuality.  Most of them completely ignore the opposite sex altogether.

01 7 / 2014

tastefullyoffensive:

Airplane Sleep Positions by Demetri Martin

01 7 / 2014

mr-cappadocia:

molten-heart:

anastasiajeanettemarie:

sizvideos:

If Girls Hit On Guys Like Guys Hit On Girls - Video

LOOK AT THIS. LOOK AT THIS, MEN WHO DO THIS, AND FEEL FOOLISH

Do you see how ridiculous this looks? How obscene?

Actually… they intentionally used what was the most negative expected response from females and plastered it on men’s faces.

It would fucking make my YEAR if some girl rolled up and told me I was attractive.

I had a gay boy hit on me once at a gothic coffee shop many years ago. He took my hand and kissed it. He didn’t know if I was gay or straight, he was just making a pass. I can tell you right now I was blushing ear to ear and grinning like an idiot. Was one of the most awesome experiences of my youth.

And I have zero interest in men. 

But being selected like that… being shown I was attractive… being someone’s object of desire?

That was fucking AWESOME and a hell of a compliment.

So, the above is good for a propaganda piece… but I can tell you right now without a doubt legion are the men that would shit themselves if someone paid that kind of attention to them… they wouldn’t know how to handle it. That kind of joy.

This whole fucking piece is about rich people sneering at the impoverished and telling them how good they have it not to have prying eyes desire their wealth.

(via dontneedfeminism)

01 7 / 2014

mr-cappadocia:

tipsy-arachnid:

taylorswiftisawinchester:

sad-butsassy:

devourer-of-gods:

No, this is why women survive longer than men.

this hurt to look at

actually it’s true. in sociology we learn about the fact that men participate in more risky behavior to prove masculinity and this is a way the patriarchy hurts men and pat of the reason the life expectancy is longer for women

Jesus Christ, I wasn’t going to reblog this but then that last one was just so WHY WOULD YOU that I had to

This has fuck all to do with “Patriarchy" and everything to do with natural selection.

Men that were willing to take more risks were more likely to be selected as mating partners by women. This is *still true*.

Taking risks tend to provide greater rewards on the whole, if not for the guy that dies trying then for the guy that succeeds.

For the dumber children at home it goes like this.

Dave and Frank are single men that are in all other ways equal. Each desires the hand of fair Marjory. Dave starts a business, it succeeds, he gets rich. Marjory, seeing the benefits of a wealthy Dave instead of an impoverished Frank selects Dave as her mating partner.

But let’s suppose Dave tried to start a business and it failed catastrophically and destroyed him financially and left him disabled. Only then does Marjorie then select Frank.

In other words Frank has a vested interest in two things… Either succeeding on a grander scale than Dave… or causing Dave to fail.

This is why all men everywhere are in some form of competition with one another.

Because that competition directly benefits women. Because the failures are discarded to die alone, and the winners are used for power and provision.

This is so deeply ingrained into the male psyche that it is instinctual at this point. If I don’t risk X, if I don’t accomplish Y then she won’t love me.

This is why many men are so terribly afraid of their female partners succeeding. Because he has been taught, from birth, that his entire value to her depends heavily on what he can offer her financially. So when she supersedes him his self esteem plummets.

This is why guys take risks. This is why guys “show off”. Because those that don’t are quietly forgotten and die alone.

(Source: megustamemes, via dontneedfeminism)

30 6 / 2014

isao-takeda:

2014年6月28日 平池公園 兵庫県加東市

isao-takeda:

2014年6月28日 平池公園 兵庫県加東市

(via demonsparrow)

30 6 / 2014

30 6 / 2014

30 6 / 2014

peregrin-fool-of-a-took:

Well looks I’ve found what John Green uses to write metaphors with.

peregrin-fool-of-a-took:

Well looks I’ve found what John Green uses to write metaphors with.

(Source: golfingfetus, via the-absolute-funniest-posts)